In light of a comment I received on one of my other posts I’ve
decided to delve a little deeper into a certain topic. When I write I don’t do
it for any reason other than the fact that a certain topic has come to me and
the words are just there. Often it is a topic that I am thinking on and those
thoughts are brought together through my writing.
The topic of preachers came about through different means
this time. I wrote the first of this very recent series of posts as a result of
a request. When I sat down to write that post I wasn’t sure if I could pull it
off. Not because I didn’t think I could write it but because the person that
asked me if I could had a specific thing they hoped I could say with it and I wasn’t
sure I could make my own thoughts and feelings turn into the beliefs this other
person wanted conveyed. And so it was with more than a little trepidation that I
began to write that post (http://journeyingtochrist.blogspot.com/2015/08/peddling-christ.html).
In the end I was able to write what the person had requested and do it in a way
that conveyed what the person had wanted pointed out.
But it was in the aftermath of that post that I found myself
writing a couple of other posts. They came about because of the things I learned
while writing that post and now…with this post…as a result of conversations
spawned from those posts.
In a comment on one of those posts a very kind reader said: May the Lord guide you as you seek
to reveal the insanity of seminary 'pastors'.
It got me to thinking a bit on exactly what I was doing
through my recent posts. You see…I never set out to reveal anything. I was
simply writing a post that had been requested of me, and in so doing find
myself writing much on seminary preachers as a result.
I’m going to take this topic a bit further. How much so, I don’t
know. I’ll write on this topic while I’m being led to write them and then I’ll
move on to something else when I need to.
For right now I’d like to point to the things said in the
comment that prompted this post:
If men have to be coached on how to preach,
and churned out of seminaries like some type of assembly line, that tells me
these men have not been called by God to preach. To many, it isn't a calling,
it's a career choice made by them and NOT by God.
I couldn’t agree with this more. I fail to see how anyone
that is supposedly ‘called’ by God to do anything would need a man-made
education to do what they’ve been ‘called’ to do. If the Lord truly has planned
for you to do something you will need help from no man to do it. 1 john 2:27
tells us that if we are anointed we will need no need for man to teach us.
And yet preacher after preacher gets turned out of seminary
claiming to be ordained and that somehow gives them great authority over the
many ‘churches’ in our country.
Years ago, when I was in junior high, I took a class on
choir…never mind the question that comes to mind on why choir should be a class…and
in that class we were taught a song about all the houses being the same, all
the people being the same, all the education being the same. At the time I enjoyed
the song, it was fun for me, but as I think on that song now I see the very ‘assembly
line’ mentality in that song that the above comment spoke of. In that song it
said people went to university to become a doctor or a lawyer…but I’m going to
add in that they went to become a preacher too.
And why?
We can look to the disciples, to the apostles, to Christ, to
see the model for how preaching should be done. Were any of these men going to
school to learn how to preach?
"Now when they saw the boldness
of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men,
they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with
Jesus." Acts 4:13
The above verse clearly says that Peter and John were ‘unlearned
men’, they were uneducated. They were common, ordinary, men. And yet they
taught of Christ. And taught well.
But today our society barely acknowledges someone as a
preacher if they don’t hold a degree from a seminary. I’ve been in ‘church’
buildings where they wouldn’t allow anyone to preach if they weren’t seminary
trained.
Why?
What were they afraid a common man might teach on their
stage?
I’ll be the first to say that I’ve met a lot of ‘nice’
preachers. I’ve stayed in their homes even. I’m not saying these aren’t nice
men. Some of them are, some of them aren’t. Some would do anything for anybody,
some wouldn’t lower themselves to the point of doing for anyone they saw as
beneath their position.
After receiving the comment I referred to above I did a
little research. The first seminary in America started in 1808. Before that
there was a seminary prototype at a University that began in 1636 that taught
from reformation patterns. Think about what that means…if the first seminary of
any type began in 1636…what did preachers do before then?
Even if we go to the first official seminary in 1808…what
did preachers do before it opened? Think of the numbers of ‘preachers’
that/those seminaries could have taught. What of the preachers that couldn’t
afford to go there? What of the ones that chose not to?
I have a book that calls Sunday sermons ‘shows’. It refers
to these sermons as entertainment. When I think of the ‘church’ I sometimes
attend I can clearly see what this writer is talking about. When I think of
other ‘churches’ I’ve attended in the past I can see it. So much goes into
pulling the people in and keeping them coming back. Why? If the purpose is to
give the gospel could a preacher not get in front of a crowd week after week
and say the same exact thing and never need worry over any repeat visitors?
Would he not be reaching the people in the crowd with the
most important message there is? Would those interested, those that are truly
being drawn, not come back…either to the sermon or to talk to the preacher?
Why do we need to put on a ‘spiritual’ circus every week
complete with a new show?
The Puritans certainly didn’t do that. Neither did the
reformers. I’d have to hazard a guess and say most of the ‘churches’ of the 18th
and 19th centuries didn’t either…whether or not these were teaching
Truth is a different matter.
So I looked a little deeper. I turned my thoughts and my
attention to the Puritans. These were…after all…people that gave up just about
everything to search for religious freedom. And I discovered something rather
interesting.
The Piligrims, left Englad because of persecution. They
found religious freedom in Holland but that was short lived as they soon
discovered their children were in danger of loosing their religion. And so they
set sail again…this time for what would become known as America.
Before ever stepping off the Mayflower, the men wrote out
their beliefs and created not just a government document but a written covenant
between themselves and God. This covenant was the basis for the Bible
commonwealth they planned to establish…and at its foundations was the Lord.
There is so much more I’d like to go into here. So much more
of what these Pilgrims stood for and what they hoped to gain by moving to a
place where they could live out their beliefs. But I’m going to stick to the
topic at hand.
The Pilgrims greatly valued the education of their children
and put much of their money toward the furthering of their education. Calvin
had stressed the importance of learned clergy and the Pilgrims created schools
that could create these men. As a result in only 17 years the Pilgrims put in
place an education system that taught their children from primary school all
the way through University.
On
the surface it may seem that what the Pilgrims did with education completely
goes against the point I’m trying to make, after all I used these men as
examples, but let me explain. You see, these men came from one country seeking
the freedom to serve God the way they believed…in freedom. And they found it.
They
made a covenant with God on how they would run their new country. They
instituted schools that taught their children based on those beliefs. And this
was good. But the trouble comes in that they, as they sought to teach their
children of those beliefs, to educate them further, followed a man into that
teaching and set the foundation for the system that would eventually become the
seminaries as we have them today.
I
do, however, highly doubt that the Pilgrim university looked anything like the
University teachings of today. But even if it did, did these men not take their
own ideas of what knowledge should be, take another man’s ideas of what it
should be, and create a system that completely disregarded what we’re taught in
Acts 4?
These
founding fathers of our country, that so valued their religious freedoms that
they moved across the world to gain them, quickly put into place a complete
system of man-made education. These were men that wrote out a covenant with God
as to how they would run their new home…and they instituted man-made teaching
within 17 years of that covenant.
Why
not just teach their children of the Bible that they had given up so much for?
Why
not teach their sons how to preach by using Paul as an example?
Why
not start their new country, their new home, their new religious freedom, by
knowing nothing but Christ?
Whatever
their reasonings were, they set the foundation for the many educational systems
we have in place today. And those systems today, although vastly different…I’m
sure…from the Pilgrims schools, have so infiltrated our country to the point
that our society places education above all else.
Last
week my five, nine, and twelve year old children were asked by a seven and ten
year old what college they were going to. These two children seemed shocked
when we said we weren’t college bound and then they went on to tell my children
which college they intended to go. Can I point out that these are children? What happened to play? What
happened to which doll is your favorite? What happened to playing house…as I did
as a child?
These
two children that spoke so much of college are but an example of what our
society has become. We now value education to the point that preschoolers are
questioned on what they want to be when they grow up. They’re spoken to of
college when they’re barely out of diapers.
There
is someone that has offered to pay my daughters way through college. Nice as
this is, this person is so set on my daughter going to college that every
conversation between my daughter and this person always winds up containing a
discussion of college. This person is pushing my daughter hard to go to college
even though she has said many times that she doesn’t want to go.
This
same person holds a belief that education is the beginning and end of
everything in life. Education, for this person, is put above all else. It is
the measuring stick through which this person measures the world and all that’s
in it. You’re either a business person or you’re uneducated. So much so that I’ve
heard this person say that those that aren’t educated (meaning college) can’t
carry on a conversation because they have nothing to talk about.
It
would seem that whether or not you hold a degree from a college has a direct
impact on your ability to think and talk…at least by this persons standards.
Sadly,
that belief has taken hold of our society to the point that everything gets
measured through that lens. Even our preachers. In 99% of ‘church’ buildings a
man must hold a degree from a seminary to be able to preach.
And
those seminaries are teaching things like ‘the art of preaching’. Now I’m sure
they’re teaching other things too but anytime a ‘school’ that should be
teaching Biblical truth and nothing else starts teaching preaching as an art…and
as I understand it they also teach how to target your audience so that your
preaching appeals to whoever is in front of you…then you no longer have
Biblical truth but man-made ideas.
And
we gain yet another group of ‘assembly line’ preachers that can do nothing but
play to their audiences enjoyment.
Well said - good article :-)
ReplyDeleteWhy is it the Bible says the Holy Spirit is our teacher, and yet, men insist upon seminary 'training'? Who better prepares a man called of God to preach - a man-made institution or God the Spirit? Who knows the things of God better? Who empowers and imparts truth? I see no need for seminary training, other than the money made. If one were to attend the Master's College, where John MacArthur is President, it would cost you over forty thousand dollars {source - http://www.collegecalc.org/colleges/california/the-masters-college-and-seminary/}
Where does the Bible state one must go into debt in order to be made ready to preach? These seminaries are a great disguise by man to make lots of $$, all using religion as the 'means' to do so.
Now, look briefly at the Apostle Paul again, from Galatians...
Gal 1:15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,
Gal 1:16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:
Gal 1:17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.
Gal 1:18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.
Gal 1:19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
Look at verse 16, immediately he conferred NOT with any man, or man-made institution. He did not consult any of the other apostles; instead he went into Arabia, then to Damascus. In Matthew Henry's commentary on these verses, he states this, "One thing peculiar in the character of an apostle was that he had been called to, and instructed for, this office immediately by Christ himself." This I agree with, however, Henry also states this, "Ordinary ministers, as they receive their call to preach the gospel by the mediation of others, so it is by means of the instruction and assistance of others that they are brought to the knowledge of it." I think Henry is in error in stating there's a difference in ministers, i.e., 'ordinary' as opposed to the calling Paul received. It seems the mindset of a need to be assisted stems back even to Henry's day. That isn't to say a wiser, mature brother cannot mentor and aide a younger brother called to preach, for surely they can.
end of part one.....
Part two...
ReplyDeleteWe should recall how educated Paul was in his 'religion' before Christ called him - he truly was a Pharisee of Pharisees. He was taught by men, yet, horribly ignorant of spiritual truths from God's word. The same can be said for Nicodemus in John 3:3-12. Concerning 'art thou a master of Israel' from verse 10, John Gill writes "He was not a common teacher; not a teacher of babes, nor a teacher in their synagogues, or in their "Midrashim", or divinity schools, but in their great sanhedrim; and the article before the word used will admit it to be rendered, "that master", doctor, or teacher; that famous, and most excellent one, who was talked of all over Jerusalem and Judea, as a surpassing one: and now, though he was not only an Israelite, with whom were the laws, statutes, judgments, and oracles of God, the writings of Moses, and the prophets; but a teacher of Israelites, and in the highest class of teachers, and of the greatest fame among them, yet was he ignorant of the first and most important things in religion". These two highly educated and respected 'religious' men were void of true spiritual truth until they had an 'encounter' with the living God. Unless God reveals His truth, all man claims to know and pass on to others is dung.
As for the 'need' to be educated, our society is programmed to believe that intelligence breeds lots of $$. That's what life is all about, making money and living comfortably in this life. However, the Bible teaches against such rubbish - Luk 14:33 So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.
Matthew 6:19, Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal.
Those are just two examples of God forbidding materialism and loving money,
The most important 'job' a woman can have is being a wife and a mother and working inside the home. Unfortunately for some, such as myself, the consequences of past sinful choices have forced me to have to work outside the home. But, that isn't what God intended. I know many will give the example of Ruth gleaning in the fields, but that wasn't a 'full time' job for Ruth. Also, there was a God-given purpose for her doing so.
One final point, how do these 'seminaries' know if a man has truly been called by God? They don't know, and they don't care. IF you have over forty grand, you are in. Upon checking the requirements of entering into MacArthur's Master's college for seminary training, you'll find this, "Statement of faith in Jesus Christ". Just a verbal profession gets you in! That's it....that's ALL they require. There's no testing, no examining the fruit, just repeat that requirement, give a 'testimony' and you're in.
Another problem is the 'titles' man gives, such as 'Dr. MacArthur' or Dr. Sproul'. I encourage all to read this excellent writing on this fleshly matter - http://www.pbministries.org/books/pink/Miscellaneous/doctor_or_brother.htm
Many blessings to you dear sister